Should There Be Drug Testing At Trail Races?
Need the question even be asked? Trail running seems to me to be one of the
purest sports available. Although there
are many reasons to become involved in trail running, one of them has to be its
simplicity. A pair of shoes, shorts and
a shirt, some food, and a good trail
are all you need to be a trail runner.
Insert the word road for trail above and everything changes. With roads come things like asphalt, manmade
structures, crowded courses, huge corporate sponsors, and maybe doping-worthy
purses. How do performance enhancing
drugs (not to be confused with experience enhancing drugs) enter the simple equation
of trail running? Since the question has
been posed I’ll assume it has become a reality.
What follows is an attempt to break down the few potential reasons why someone
might select trail running as a sport, and then take drugs to be better at
it.
Time on the Trail –
Trail running is not easy. We do it in
part because it is hard, because we are unsure of our own ability to complete
something so monumental. We put in lots
of hours . . . lots. Performance
enhancing drugs, on the other hand, are a shortcut to excellence. These two personality traits (dedication and
apathy) are in conflict with one another.
Why choose something so difficult to cut corners?
Fame – Most of us
find fame in recognizing old race acquaintances, reading a race report on a
blog, and maybe even achieving a personal best.
We enjoy reading about elite runners, and watching them in person is a
real treat, but we all run the same distance.
My ability to recall the names of the people I meet at events is already poor. How can I be expected to favor
an elite runner I have never met? Enrichment
through fame is limited.
Money – I would guess
that winning these races will not make one rich. There may be free gear, entry fees and if one
is really lucky, training in Europe on some shoe-maker’s dime (which would be
amazing), but where is sustained wealth?
Using drugs, which cost money, to win belt buckles and usually small
sums of money (if any at all) is counterintuitive.
Personal Success
– Even in the absence of fame and money, success is tainted when drugs are used
to achieve it. Why run hours upon hours
every day, spend a great deal of time planning with pacers and crews, only to
ruin the purity of a win with drugs? A
really good runner, if he or she works hard, might be able to win. If not, enjoy coming in sixth, 40th,
or even last – the success is the journey taken to complete the distance.
Solutions are elusive, but here are a few suggestions:
We should separate trail running events into two
classes. We’ll have one class for Traitorous Ultrarunners Racing on DrugS, or T.U.R.D.S. for short. RD’s can perform drug testing on the field of modified
runners while crew members jostle for position at the aid stations. For added excitement, they can include obstacles
on the course and hang huge sponsor banners from the trees in some of the most
remote stretches. Then maybe it can be
televised and all the runners can take breaks when they go to commercial!
Everyone I have ever met while trail running will choose the
other class. No need for a flashy name
because none of us care much about such stuff.
We’ll be at the local race to see friends or a destination run to
experience something new. We will laugh
together, experience snapshots of the Earth in its various moods, push ourselves in
ways we never imagined, and in the process be renewed.
In truth, it seems to me the solution is much easier than
drug testing. Look each entrant in the
eye, and ask them “Is there any place in the world you would rather be at this
moment?” Any reply other than an
emphatic “No Way” is telling enough.